breadarr/ci
Breadway 812b70d4b7
All checks were successful
dev release / build (push) Successful in 2m39s
ci: link breadarrd/breadarr-tui against hestia's glibc, not the CI container's
hestia (the actual deployment target) runs Ubuntu 24.04 (glibc 2.39);
the shared Arch CI image tracks a much newer glibc (currently 2.43).
A binary linked normally there requires GLIBC_2.43 symbols and refuses
to start on hestia at all (glibc symbol versioning is forward-only) —
this is what crashed breadarrd in production after its first
bakery-managed install.

Fix: ci/build.sh now pulls a real glibc + gcc-libs (for libstdc++)
package pair from the Arch Linux Archive, matching hestia's actual
versions, and links against them via --sysroot instead of the
container's native ones. cargo-zigbuild (targeting an older glibc via
zig's cross-linker) was tried first and doesn't work here: zig has no
version database for libstdc++ specifically, and onnxruntime --
statically linked in by the ort crate -- needs a real, complete one.
A real archived glibc+gcc-libs pair sidesteps that entirely.

reqwest's native-tls now vendors (statically builds) OpenSSL instead
of dynamically linking the build host's, since the old sysroot has no
libssl/libcrypto of its own — also means the shipped binary no longer
depends on the target system's OpenSSL version at all.

Verified end-to-end on hestia's actual self-hosted runner: real
ci/build.sh, real bread-ci:breadarr image, real docker build/run —
produced binary requires GLIBC up to 2.39 and GLIBCXX up to 3.4.30
only, and actually starts and runs on hestia.
2026-08-15 22:33:16 +08:00
..
bread-ecosystem.rev CI: adopt the shared pinned-Arch-container build system 2026-08-05 19:15:47 +08:00
build.sh ci: link breadarrd/breadarr-tui against hestia's glibc, not the CI container's 2026-08-15 22:33:16 +08:00